If the limitation is structural, the larger battery pack could help increase the strength of the structure and as a consequence, increase the payload.I provided similar feedback to some people I know within Rivian. My original deposit (2018) was intended to order a Max pack...I stuck with this configuration for a long time and thus missed out on the LE. Finally, after reading between the lines in conversations I switched to the Large pack. I continued to ask, how do you get past the GVWR limitations? Is the Max pack going to have a higher rating to offer a decent payload? Who wants a 400+ mile Off-road truck that you can only carry 4 people and zero gear? Honestly, I think Rivian can do better than the poorly delivered communications coming from Tony.
Never.Getting real sick of my posts?
No, making a joke about Rivian update shenanigans.Getting real sick of my posts?
That's the way I read your post.No, making a joke about Rivian update shenanigans.
For the near term in the current R1 platform, Rivian has already stated that the dual-motor will be the same 450v architecture. So until they decide to do a major refresh on the R1 tech, 800v does not appear to be happening anytime s00n.My uneducated guess is the max pack will move to a 800v+ architecture which means new motors are needed. A higher voltage architecture will allow for more efficient motors, cabling and charging up to or exceeding the 350kw that is currently deployed and seems like it would be needed for the even larger battery pack.
This is also what I'm really hoping for .....so that makes it easier to assume they're doing this.
I don't understand how they keep saying 300kw+ charging soon then, this is on the 'Charging' portion of the Rivian website. That would be close to 800A....I suppose they could do what GM does but still disappointing since it seems like 800v+ is the futureFor the near term in the current R1 platform, Rivian has already stated that the dual-motor will be the same 450v architecture. So until they decide to do a major refresh on the R1 tech, 800v does not appear to be happening anytime s00n.
See comments starting at 19:17
Soon seems to be very relative with Rivian, but it would make sense that they future proof their RAN network with the capability, even if they do not yet have vehicles that can take that kind of throughput right now.I don't understand how they keep saying 300kw+ charging soon then, this is on the 'Charging' portion of the Rivian website. That would be close to 800A....I suppose they could do what GM does but still disappointing since it seems like 800v+ is the future
This has been a pet peeve of mine, and it was definitely more confusing before because they intermix the R1 specs with RAN specs on that page.I don't understand how they keep saying 300kw+ charging soon then, this is on the 'Charging' portion of the Rivian website. That would be close to 800A....I suppose they could do what GM does but still disappointing since it seems like 800v+ is the future
That makes sense ....it just seems so behind the ball to develop an in-house 400v motor when even Hyundai leaned in with 800v on their Ioniq/EV6/GV60 architecture.This has been a pet peeve of mine, and it was definitely more confusing before because they intermix the R1 specs with RAN specs on that page.
That page is solely talking about the capabilities of the chargers. They had planned on implementing 800v on the vehicles, but at some point somewhat recently decided not to in the near term. So "300kw" is now in reference to R2 or an updated R1 or other vehicles when they open up the chargers to other manufacturers.
Hyundai dumped a bunch of money into that, and it's been genius for them. You basically have Hyundai group, Lucid, and Porsche/Audi. And then sort of GM. Hyundai deserves credit that they produce some awesome cars.That makes sense ....it just seems so behind the ball to develop an in-house 400v motor when even Hyundai leaned in with 800v on their Ioniq/EV6/GV60 architecture.
Definitely makes me more likely to stop waiting for the max pack and just jump into a large pack sooner.
Especially irksome since the updates usually get another update and the news is never good, always just an upbeat way of saying "you're not getting what you ordered, what you're getting is not ready, we're not sure about the price and we don't know specifically what we're going to deliver" … Max Pack is particularly egregious because it's gone from a clear promise of a feature, function and performance that was going into the launch edition, to a downgraded configuration that may or may not even deliver the core benefit of 185kWh versus 135kWh, and it's going to be most of two years late.Have to say I'm getting real sick of these "update that we're going to update you later" emails.