R1S88
Well-Known Member
I think the Magic Dock has a longer cable, which will help with the charging port being on different sides. An adapter doesn't solve that problem.
Sponsored
I agree if they are longer but the pictures of the ones I have seen were not longer cables.I think the Magic Dock has a longer cable, which will help with the charging port being on different sides. An adapter doesn't solve that problem.
Uhhh your math is a little off there. Tesla has like 12,000 V3 stations, each with 8-20 stalls. Even if we go with the 3,500 number, that’s a pretty significant investment for them for something that’s a temporary hurdle. New vehicles won’t use CCS charging in a year or two.Why? It would be WAY more efficient to retrofit <10,000 chargers to use Magic Dock (Tesla has described the retrofit as simple and inexpensive) rather than mandating that millions of individuals each buy an adapter and carry it around with them in case they might possibly want to use a Supercharger somewhere.
But that also explains it - Tesla can now sell millions of adapters, instead of paying for <10,000 Magic Dock retrofits. Nothing wrong with them maximizing profit, just don't mistake this for Tesla being motivated by higher goals. And don't expect them to charge you the same amount as they do Tesla owners, unless perhaps you pay a monthly membership fee.
In their Magic Dock announcement, Tesla promised to make 3,500 Superchargers available to non-Tesla vehicles by the end of 2024. So far they have 12 sites - 9 in NY and 2 in CA, which opened in March and 1 new one in TX which opened a few weeks ago.
They have about 48,000 stalls globally. Many are not V3. Only 5,200 stations (again not all V3).Uhhh your math is a little off there. Tesla has like 12,000 V3 stations, each with 8-20 stalls. Even if we go with the 3,500 number, that’s a pretty significant investment for them for something that’s a temporary hurdle. New vehicles won’t use CCS charging in a year or two.
It’s 12,000 v3 chargers total, not 12k sites.Uhhh your math is a little off there. Tesla has like 12,000 V3 stations, each with 8-20 stalls. Even if we go with the 3,500 number, that’s a pretty significant investment for them for something that’s a temporary hurdle. New vehicles won’t use CCS charging in a year or two.
Ah! Didn’t realize that.It’s 12,000 v3 chargers total, not 12k sites.
DOE data from a month or two ago showed 1,847 Tesla stations and 20,040 total ports in the US. A large % of those are v1 and v2, which won’t work with the Magic Dock or with any adapters.Ah! Didn’t realize that.
I believe the level 1 and level 2 stations do actually work with adapters … Tesla Tap Mini adapter for one.DOE data from a month or two ago showed 1,847 Tesla stations and 20,040 total ports in the US. A large % of those are v1 and v2, which won’t work with the Magic Dock or with any adapters.
From what I've heard if Tesla wants federal money they need to have CCS which is why they are looking at magic dock.Honest questions, why should Tesla bear the cost to retrofit SC’s? If CCS provided same speed and availability (# chargers & uptime), would this even be a conversation?
EV buyers who need more than 200 mi/day, should have done more research on SC networks. Uneducated buyer is root cause. Tesla drivers don’t have same complaints.
I assume Tesla has done the math and retrofitting will provide a reasonable rate of return.Honest questions, why should Tesla bear the cost to retrofit SC’s? If CCS provided same speed and availability (# chargers & uptime), would this even be a conversation?
EV buyers who need more than 200 mi/day, should have done more research on SC networks. Uneducated buyer is root cause. Tesla drivers don’t have same complaints.