Wrong battery installed in my Rivian?

[Cascadian]

No need to actually charge to 100% to see it. There is an item to the left of the same screen that you tap on. It will show you projected range in 3 drive modes @ full charge (20" AT Quad-Large is shown).

Charging to 100% should be avoided, if you can help it. Unless you have LFP cells in your HV pack—which Rivian has not put into consumer orders yet (that we know of).

I have seen no change from 273 for my R1S since delivery; 2 months and 2,000+ miles.
With the winter weather my trip readings have all been way less than 2 miles/kWh.

Sponsored

 

[RivAW]

No need to actually charge to 100% to see it. There is an item to the left of the same screen that you tap on. It will show you projected range in 3 drive modes @ full charge (20" AT Quad-Large is shown).

Charging to 100% should be avoided, if you can help it. Unless you have LFP cells in your HV pack—which Rivian has not put into consumer orders yet (that we know of).

Stop already rumors….there is no problem with charging to 100%. The degradation this would cause would be negligible over the lifetime of the vehicle.
What you are not supposed to do is leave it sitting at ? SOC for an extended period. Most suggest the battery is generally “happiest” between 20-80, and either extreme should generally be avoided (but it’s the sitting at the SOC o

Thanks for all the responses. Yes just got home from work to a fleury of messages. I did have a chat with Rivian Service and that mentioned to me that this is very odd and have to investigate further.

Haha, they actually called me for a service request about range and my upcoming appointment in Gaithersburg. Since I had them on the phone I addressed my concern. They had me send them pictures to confirm. My Range in all purpose at 100% says 314.

Mystery solved then…software mistake…that’s the range you should have at ? in all purpose with the 22s. Congrats on your large-pack, regardless of what the screens says (and that they don’t actually make sell Quad motors with standard pack ).

 

[UnsungZero_OldTimeAdMan]

I have seen no change from 273 for my R1S since delivery; 2 months and 2,000+ miles.
With the winter weather my trip readings have all been way less than 2 miles/kWh.

And? You'd rather it be different? Something needs to be wrong to be right? Must have drama in your life? I don't understand.

It just means your driving is fairly consistent and everything is performing as designed/expected.

 

[Cascadian]

And? You'd rather it be different? Something needs to be wrong to be right? Must have drama in your life? I don't understand.

It just means your driving is fairly consistent and everything is performing as designed/expected.

You seem a little sensitive.
Calm down.
I just stated a fact.

 

[UnsungZero_OldTimeAdMan]

You seem a little sensitive.
Calm down.
I just stated a fact.

If you took that as “sensitive”, then perhaps it is you who is.

 

[CruxOp]

I have seen no change from 273 for my R1S since delivery; 2 months and 2,000+ miles.
With the winter weather my trip readings have all been way less than 2 miles/kWh.

I don't get why some cars are showing 273 while others are showing 283. Is there a software update some of us are missing?

 

[opnwide]

FWIW, I’ve never been accused of being “standard” instead of “large”.

 

[kyunam]

I have seen no change from 273 for my R1S since delivery; 2 months and 2,000+ miles.
With the winter weather my trip readings have all been way less than 2 miles/kWh.

+1
I’m at 22+K. Numerous reset, no matter how gentle I drive, those numbers stays the same.

 

[Dark-Fx]

I have seen no change from 273 for my R1S since delivery; 2 months and 2,000+ miles.
With the winter weather my trip readings have all been way less than 2 miles/kWh.

Only goes up from EPA. Won't go down.

 

[Riviot]

FWIW, I’ve never been accused of being “standard” instead of “large”.

You know what they say about trucks with large batteries...




... They get ~313 conserve miles with 20" ATs

 

[shimps1]

Just noticed my 23 R1S on 50.1 is also showing "standard pack," so there does seem to be a bug somewhere.

 

[Christos]

Glad to see I am not the only one with a bug showing a standard pack.

 

[jjswan33]

Only goes up from EPA. Won't go down.

I agree with you but 273 isn’t EPA anymore. If mine says 284 I don’t understand why any would be lower.

 

[R1Thor]

Gaithersburg is a solid SC. The is is too many Rivians in the DMV. Wait time is absurd. But they’re a good team.

Not just DMV--a good chunk of PA is using that SC as well (myself included)!

 

[falconbro]

Go to 100% please and then let’s look at the range number. If you’re 284 at 80%. Likely you’re about 314 at 100%. So you would have a large pack. I hope that is the case for you.

284/80% is 355

Sponsored