waitingonanr1s
Well-Known Member
This is ridiculous. Updates always take 2 weeks or so to roll out. Someone was always going to end up with less Halloween mode time than others. It seems very fair to me for them to follow through with priority updates to paying subscribers, after communicating said priority updates for months leading up to implementation.The more I've considered it, the more I've concluded that it's just wrong to have time-limited features impacted by Connect+. Other than that, I don't have an issue with C+ subscribers getting updates sooner.
As they've pitched it, the reason for Connect+ costing what it does is the bandwidth usage/data (value) C+ subscribers get (hotspots, streaming, satellite imagery, etc.). That part seems perfectly fair. If you want features that have an ongoing cost to Rivian to provide, you should expect to pay for them, and a subscription model for that sort of thing makes perfect sense. They've not advertised that time-limited seasonal themes are part of the C+ value, but it seems they have employed that as a tactic to drive subscriptions.
One way they could have implemented this (and the way I had expected to see it) would be to embed the time-limited features in an earlier release, and then switch them on for everyone simultaneously. C+ subscribers would still get access to the other real features earlier, plus the actual bandwidth/data features they're paying for, without shorting the non-C+ subscribers who would like to enjoy the full value of a non-C+ time-limited fun feature.
Another way they could have gone (and tbh I'd really prefer this) would be to remove the artificial time limit. It's been suggested that the seasonal features might be time-limited on account of licensing (plausible for some parts, but not others), but in general, there are lots of things that owners might like to enjoy whenever they're in the mood. The owl hoot, or crow sound, or seasonal lighting, etc. Why shouldn't we have access to those parts year-round? Rivian paid to develop them so they're a sunk cost, not an ongoing cost like bandwidth/data. Many owners would like to enjoy those features at will.
When C+ was announced, I made the conscious decision not to subscribe based on the perceived value to me of the bandwidth/data products they offered with it. I decided to try things without it and see if using my phone's hotspot and data plan would suffice since most of the things I wanted from C+ could be gotten that way. If I felt differently about Gear Guard Live Cam or some other things I might have come to a different conclusion. Now I see that with the bandwidth/data features (that I may not want or need), there is also a fun-factor cost they hadn't disclosed when they advertised C+.
This dick move on the part of Rivian to short non-C+ subscribers (and a few C+ subscribers too) on a fun non-C+ feature is just not cool. In the grand scheme of things it may be minor, but it's still not cool - and it makes me sad to see such a cool company employing such a dick move.
Sponsored