UnsungZero_OldTimeAdMan
Well-Known Member
And probably why A2Z still hasn't put it up for sale.If @A2ZEV is a reputable company, and they claim to be, they will never sell an extension. Every connection increases the resistance, regardless of the quality of the cable or connector.
If it's an active cable, it's going to require an external power source. Could even be a 9V battery or something. It's still going to have to be enormously thick to allow the full current that a Tesla station can provide. The fun part for me? This means losing the "advantage" that Tesla NACS has over CCS, because the cable will have to be stupidly unwieldy to be functional.
Tesla should have just prioritized changing their compatible stations over to V4, like Rivian has been doing for their 1.5 stations. I'm glad RJ didn't decide to just fire the entire RAN team.
And when asked (or was it when they saw mention of A2Z's?) Tesla engineer got on X and advised strong against idea of extension. Then, A2Z got in the conversation and offered willingness to collaborate. Weeks/months went by, no news, until State of Charge reviewed the prototype and had a chat with head of A2Z and his engineer (a former Tesla employee).There was a very brief time where Tesla mentioned an extension cord for supercharging on the Non-Tesla Supercharging page. Think it lasted for a week, then disappeared. Hasn't been mentioned since.
If Tesla isn't gonna make one, I wouldn't trust any third party version.
Sponsored