hmw
Active Member
with 92kwh in the Standard pack but running the risk of a sudden drop to 0% with the LFP you can't really trip below 20% in freezing/sub-freezing conditions meaning available battery capacity is really 74kwh BUT you can't access all the capacity in cold weather so shave some more off, at least 5% of the 92kwh. So now you're down to 69kwh if you start at 100% charge. If your battery is at ambient temps of low single digits like it is now in NJ you'd be very, very lucky to make 100 miles, more like 80-85 miles on a full charge before needing to stop and charge or 40 miles out and 40 miles back on a trip. What's that? maybe an hour of driving time each way?
Something short of ideal methinks for a $80K SUV/truck.
That's exactly what happened on my NJ to PA trip. It was 148 miles each way and I had to stop and supercharge once on the first trip and then twice (so supercharge to 85% when starting and once between) on the return journey.
Because the truck wouldn't supercharge faster than 70 kW I was stuck waiting in 0F temps - not to mention I had to hard reboot after it threw a vehicle error when supercharging. The next time I used the supercharger it just stopped charging after some time and I had to unplug the charger and replug it a few times - the app didnt warn me or say anything. My colleagues who did the trip with me in their Teslas were shaking their heads
If Rivian was so concerned that people wouldnt buy the models with the larger pack, they could have built a 125 kW LFP pack and restricted it to say 95 kWh. Then when it gets cold the pack has 30 kWh reserve and can provide the stated capacity regardless of weather.
Don't get me wrong, I love this car but I am not a blind fanboy that I can overlook some very obvious shortcomings - and the fact that Rivian is completely silent on LFP's range degradation etc
Sponsored
Last edited: