Sponsored

When will the US get true fast charging?

Yossarian

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2020
Threads
45
Messages
934
Reaction score
922
Location
SE Pennsylvania
Vehicles
R1T,Telluride, Wee-Strom, Lynskey Cooper
I didn't want to hijack a thread about the R2 in which a post suggested that a true fast charging system, something that provided a decent amount of range in about the same time as fueling an ICE vehicle, roughly five minutes, was needed to convince EV skeptics to go electric, and so started a separate thread. That post further suggested that five minute charging s unlikely to happen until we get next-generation batteries. I agree with the argument that true, five-minute fast charging will spur much greater EV adoption. I disagree that next-generation batteries are needed for that however. In fact, I would argue that five minute charging is already here, albeit on a somewhat limited basis and more importantly, not in the US. I'd also argue that it works using existing technology, and there's no structural reason that we can't at least begin the process of adoption here in the US.

In China, BYD has actually achieved charging of up to 60% battery capacity in five minutes in their Han L and Tang L models, both presently available to [Chinese] buyers at not exorbitant prices. iI's not simply a matter of the car's battery though. As this article in Inside EVs states, "It's important to understand that BYD's breakthrough isn't just a car, or a battery, or the charger itself. It's all three, and how they work in concert with each other."

The battery that the BYD uses appears to be nothing special, using evolutionary rather than revolutionary technology.. The Inside EV article describes it as simply a "derivative of BYD's "Blade" battery . . . lithium-iron-phosphate (LFP) units . . ." It does require "extensively reworked electrolytes, separators and electrodes to reduce internal resistance by a claimed 50%, not to mention the latest version of BYD's direct refrigerant cooling system." This may be a breakthrough, but it seems to me to be one that is not based on revolutionary technology,

The second element, the charger is a major step up over what we have in the US. The BYD Megawatt charger is a 1,000 kW unit, which at present seems to exist only in China and at fairly small numbers, roughly 500 concentrated in major cites, The Megawatt's days are number however; BYD has already announced that will instead install Flash Chargers operating at 1.5 kW. While there's no reason that we couldn't build chargers of Megawatt capacity here in the US, we do not have a grid that can support that level of charging. We in the US were early adopters of electricity, which was a blessing at the time, but is a problem now. Our grid is old and though were are now modernizing it, the pace is fairly slow. By comparison, grid capacity in China is nearly three times greater than in the US (roughly 3,891 GW vs 1,373 GW), and that is what makes their Megawatt/Flash Charger systems feasible.

The sorry state of the US grid, and the enormity of the task to modernize it, mean that increasing capacity will take quite some time. Combine that with our fast-growing need for more electric energy, and the recent Federal limitations that deliberately make it difficult to add the least expensive and fastest to implement forms of electrical power generation (and storage), and it may well be a decade or more before we can introduce 1,500 kW chargers. Assuming that those obstacles persist, that may well mean that our best hope for fast charging is next-generation batteries that should come to market in the next few years and will be able to work with our relatively low-capacity EV charging system to allow five-minute charging.

Edit: typo, grammar fix
Sponsored

 
Last edited:

mkg3

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2021
Threads
91
Messages
2,788
Reaction score
3,707
Location
SoCal
Vehicles
R1S, Model 3, Outback, Artura
Clubs
 
You do realize that fast charging requires vehicles to be able to accept higher voltage; hence, allows current (amps) to flow faster for the same given charger capability, right?

This is why many of us cry out for 800V+ architecture for the vehicle. The current infrastructure (mostly Tesla SC), are capable of charging EVs much faster than the vehicles ability to accept the charging.
 

KRIV_ian

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 10, 2025
Threads
7
Messages
130
Reaction score
177
Location
SoCal
Vehicles
23 R1T, 23 ID4, XC90T8
Clubs
 
As far as I know within Tesla only V4 chargers are 800V compatible, earlier versions are 400V. I don't know what the ratio of V4 to other Tesla chargers is but, not sure V4 dominates.

I also don't see many 400kW chargers out there, which would be 800V, 500A but I do agree there aren't too many vehicles taking full advantage of even the 350kW chargers. That's why new vehicles like the BMW iX3 will have an advantage over the R2 (in my opinion). The average consumer doesn't care about 400 vs 800V but they do compare charge times even if they never end up using DCFC.
 

beatle

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2024
Threads
17
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
1,562
Location
Springfield, VA
Vehicles
'23 R1T PDM Max, '97/'25 Miatas, '19 Monkey
Occupation
IT
Clubs
 
You do realize that fast charging requires vehicles to be able to accept higher voltage; hence, allows current (amps) to flow faster for the same given charger capability, right?

This is why many of us cry out for 800V+ architecture for the vehicle. The current infrastructure (mostly Tesla SC), are capable of charging EVs much faster than the vehicles ability to accept the charging.
Voltage and current (amps) are different. Most Tesla SCs only operate up to 500v, so their power is limited to around 250kw as they are also limted to around 500A of current.

A lot of non-Tesla DCFC support up to 1000v and 500A, though even "high voltage" cars here are 800V nominal which is why you see 350kw as the typical max.

The most significant thing about the Han L and Tang L is that their batteries can be charged at 10C. C rates for charging most US based EVs are terrible. I can now charge my max pack at a peak of 220kw. That's a C rate of less than 1.6C. A sustained 350kw charge rate (possible at most CCS stations) would allow us to add 60% in about 15 minutes. A Lucid can already do this in 12 minutes.

While I do think faster charge rates will be necessary to increase EV adoption for people who don't have home charging, a 15 minute stop every couple hours is plenty fast for me on a road trip.
 

DuoRivians

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2022
Threads
257
Messages
3,809
Reaction score
9,076
Location
California
Vehicles
R1T, R1S
In California there are many 800v, 350kw charging stations from EVgo, EA, Shell, and even some Tesla v4 (more coming). Even RANs are capable of 300kw.

In the past year, I’ve had no problems finding them.
 

Sponsored

kurtlikevonnegut

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2021
Threads
27
Messages
2,715
Reaction score
7,525
Location
SC/TX
Vehicles
2023 R1S DM, Honda Odyssey
Clubs
 
You make fair points, but the realities of what you describe are exactly why I said the mass adoption won't happen without revolutionary (not evolutionary) battery tech.

Can it be done? Yes, but the logistics and infrastructure requirements are so vast that it likely can't be done faster than development of revolutionary battery technology.
 

TexasBob

Well-Known Member
First Name
Bob
Joined
Jan 15, 2022
Threads
49
Messages
1,193
Reaction score
2,636
Location
Houston
Vehicles
2024 R1T DM LRG, 2025 R1S Dune
You make fair points, but the realities of what you describe are exactly why I said the mass adoption won't happen without revolutionary (not evolutionary) battery tech.

Can it be done? Yes, but the logistics and infrastructure requirements are so vast that it likely can't be done faster than development of revolutionary battery technology.
Mass adoption is already here in the larger and more technologically advanced markets. We need to face the reality that the US is now a smaller, backward looking market hiding behind protectionist barriers to shield uncompetitive companies from global competition. The battery breakthroughs are already happening every year (solid state, sodium, lfp blade, etc etc) and they trickle over to the US after 5-7 years. The Chinese market is delivering 500 mile vehicles and 10 minute recharge time. The US is delivering stuff that was competitive 7 years ago (cf R2). It is sad but true.
 

kurtlikevonnegut

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2021
Threads
27
Messages
2,715
Reaction score
7,525
Location
SC/TX
Vehicles
2023 R1S DM, Honda Odyssey
Clubs
 
Mass adoption is already here in the larger and more technologically advanced markets.
Yeah that's simply not true. 80% of Americans live in urban areas, but EVs only represent 12% of American cars. Those numbers do not support "mass adoption" unless you're saying that only a handful of cities in the US are "technologically advanced."

Meanwhile, a minority of people in China even own cars, so please give the idea that "China" is leaps and bounds ahead a rest. A very small minority of people in China actually have access to the highest level of technology in that market, and what is available is heavily subsidized by the CCP.
 
Last edited:

Dark-Fx

Well-Known Member
First Name
Brian
Joined
Jul 15, 2020
Threads
147
Messages
13,526
Reaction score
27,297
Location
Michigan
Vehicles
R1T, R1S, Livewire One, Sierra EV, R1S
Occupation
Engineering
Clubs
 
I think by Tuesday.
 

DCFC

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2024
Threads
0
Messages
154
Reaction score
162
Location
SoCal
Vehicles
P2
When the federal government decides to put money into it, that's when we will get better charging in both speed and availability. Of course, the whole grid and infrastructure needs an upgrade including energy storage to buffer against rapid massive increases in power demand.
 

Sponsored

beatle

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2024
Threads
17
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
1,562
Location
Springfield, VA
Vehicles
'23 R1T PDM Max, '97/'25 Miatas, '19 Monkey
Occupation
IT
Clubs
 
Mass adoption is already here in the larger and more technologically advanced markets. We need to face the reality that the US is now a smaller, backward looking market hiding behind protectionist barriers to shield uncompetitive companies from global competition. The battery breakthroughs are already happening every year (solid state, sodium, lfp blade, etc etc) and they trickle over to the US after 5-7 years. The Chinese market is delivering 500 mile vehicles and 10 minute recharge time. The US is delivering stuff that was competitive 7 years ago (cf R2). It is sad but true.
No EV anywhere offers 500 miles of EPA rated range and charges in 10 minutes. There are some cars with big range, and some that have high C-rate charging, but not both. There are some Chinese vehicles with overall good specs, and they are the overall leaders for sure, but to say they're "5-7 years" ahead is silly.

There is a balance between overall range, efficiency, and charge speeds that can change how each vehicle is ranked. As I mentioned, a lot of US EVs are severely limited by the average C-rate charge speed and the low efficiency of some of the larger vehicles. Lucid and Porsche do both pretty well. You can still put up some impressive numbers if you can charge close to the max speed of 350kw for sustained periods of time in the US. If we had higher sustained C-rates, we'd be competitive. I added the Silverado EV to the list to show that a giant battery isn't everything. It has great range from the start, but its low C-rate and terrible efficiency means you'll be sitting for a while, even though its average charging power is decent.

VehicleBattery Capacity10–70% TimeAvg. PowerAvg. C-rateCharging mphEPA Range (Est.)
Zeekr 001 (2026)95.0 kWh~7 Min480 kW5.1C1,697 mph330 Miles
BYD Han L (EV)83.2 kWh~7 Min420 kW5.1C1,671 mph325 Miles
Li Auto Mega102.7 kWh~9 Min410 kW4.0C1,260 mph315 Miles
Lucid Air (Sapphire)118.0 kWh~13 Min320 kW2.8C1,182 mph427 Miles
Porsche Taycan (2025+)97.0 kWh~12 Min291 kW3.0C1,065 mph318 Miles
Lotus Emeya98.9 kWh~11 Min331 kW3.3C1,015 mph310 Miles
Hyundai Ioniq 684.0 kWh~14 Min215 kW2.6C900 mph350 Miles
Zeekr 001 (Qilin 140)140.0 kWh~24 Min210 kW1.5C690 mph460 Miles
Tesla Model Y (LR)78.0 kWh~19 Min150 kW1.9C625 mph330 Miles
Aion LX Plus144.4 kWh~30 Min175 kW1.2C558 mph465 Miles
Nio ET7 (Ultra LR)150.0 kWh~35 Min155 kW1.0C494 mph480 Miles
Silverado EV (RST)205.0 kWh~38 Min225 kW1.1C455 mph460 Miles

 

kurtlikevonnegut

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2021
Threads
27
Messages
2,715
Reaction score
7,525
Location
SC/TX
Vehicles
2023 R1S DM, Honda Odyssey
Clubs
 
No EV anywhere offers 500 miles of EPA rated range and charges in 10 minutes. There are some cars with big range, and some that have high C-rate charging, but not both. There are some Chinese vehicles with overall good specs, and they are the overall leaders for sure, but to say they're "5-7 years" ahead is silly.

There is a balance between overall range, efficiency, and charge speeds that can change how each vehicle is ranked. As I mentioned, a lot of US EVs are severely limited by the average C-rate charge speed and the low efficiency of some of the larger vehicles. Lucid and Porsche do both pretty well. You can still put up some impressive numbers if you can charge close to the max speed of 350kw for sustained periods of time in the US. If we had higher sustained C-rates, we'd be competitive. I added the Silverado EV to the list to show that a giant battery isn't everything. It has great range from the start, but its low C-rate and terrible efficiency means you'll be sitting for a while, even though its average charging power is decent.

VehicleBattery Capacity10–70% TimeAvg. PowerAvg. C-rateCharging mphEPA Range (Est.)Zeekr 001 (2026)95.0 kWh~7 Min480 kW5.1C1,697 mph330 MilesBYD Han L (EV)83.2 kWh~7 Min420 kW5.1C1,671 mph325 MilesLi Auto Mega102.7 kWh~9 Min410 kW4.0C1,260 mph315 MilesLucid Air (Sapphire)118.0 kWh~13 Min320 kW2.8C1,182 mph427 MilesPorsche Taycan (2025+)97.0 kWh~12 Min291 kW3.0C1,065 mph318 MilesLotus Emeya98.9 kWh~11 Min331 kW3.3C1,015 mph310 MilesHyundai Ioniq 684.0 kWh~14 Min215 kW2.6C900 mph350 MilesZeekr 001 (Qilin 140)140.0 kWh~24 Min210 kW1.5C690 mph460 MilesTesla Model Y (LR)78.0 kWh~19 Min150 kW1.9C625 mph330 MilesAion LX Plus144.4 kWh~30 Min175 kW1.2C558 mph465 MilesNio ET7 (Ultra LR)150.0 kWh~35 Min155 kW1.0C494 mph480 MilesSilverado EV (RST)205.0 kWh~38 Min225 kW1.1C455 mph460 Miles
I have noticed that the Chinese EVs seem to charge at much higher C rates than US, for example the Rivian which sticks to 1 C. Being very much not a physicist, can anyone explain why? Is their battery chemistry just that different or do they not care about longevity and warranties and just let their batteries get fried after 50k miles?
 

beatle

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2024
Threads
17
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
1,562
Location
Springfield, VA
Vehicles
'23 R1T PDM Max, '97/'25 Miatas, '19 Monkey
Occupation
IT
Clubs
 
Lower nominal voltage is a big reason why the US EVs charge at lower C-rates. The Model Y charges pretty fast for being a 400v nominal car. The Cybertruck can charge at 800v on a V4 supercharger and . If a Model Y could charge at the same kw as the Cybertruck (221kw average), it'd really fly.
 

CharonPDX

Well-Known Member
First Name
Charon
Joined
Jul 12, 2021
Threads
31
Messages
2,499
Reaction score
4,172
Location
Cascadia
Vehicles
'22 R1T LE, '16 Model S, '19 Arcimoto FUV
Occupation
InfoSec Geek
Clubs
 
As far as I know within Tesla only V4 chargers are 800V compatible, earlier versions are 400V. I don't know what the ratio of V4 to other Tesla chargers is but, not sure V4 dominates.
There is currently only one full V4 800V Supercharger. And last time I checked, only half of its stalls were open - the other half have covers over them. It is capable of 500kW charging a Cybertruck, and a Lucid Gravity drew 420kW.

The vast majority of "V4 dispensers" have V3 back-ends, so are still 400V/250kW max.
 

TexasBob

Well-Known Member
First Name
Bob
Joined
Jan 15, 2022
Threads
49
Messages
1,193
Reaction score
2,636
Location
Houston
Vehicles
2024 R1T DM LRG, 2025 R1S Dune
Yeah that's simply not true. 80% of Americans live in urban areas, but EVs only represent 12% of American cars. Those numbers do not support "mass adoption" unless you're saying that only a handful of cities in the US are "technologically advanced."

Meanwhile, a minority of people in China even own cars, so please give the idea that "China" is leaps and bounds ahead a rest. A very small minority of people in China actually have access to the highest level of technology in that market, and what is available is heavily subsidized by the CCP.
The US is well behind, and on that we completely agree. There were ~21 million EVs sold last year (14.1 million BEVs and 6.6 million PHEVs) representing a 26% global market share. That is a mass adoption level in my book. Maybe you define it differently. When over half of all vehicles sold in the worlds largest car market and 25% of all sold in the third largest market (EU) are plug-in, and a number of emerging markets are skipping over ICE and going straight to EVs (Viet Nam 40% market share) then I think we are on at a mass adoption curve in most places. Not in the US.

The Technologically Advanced markets in automotive tech are clearly China (far ahead) and increasingly Europe with a blend of Chinese and German companies that have leap-frogged the US and Japanese.
Sponsored

 
 








Top