TTedP
Well-Known Member
Silhouette looks like a cousin of the R1 for sure. If it means deeper funding for Rivian and opens up VW dealers as a service center option, I'd be OK with it.
Sponsored
Not in scope of technology joint venture.and opens up VW dealers as a service center option, I'd be OK with it.
Agree. The joint venture giving VW the Rivian software might be a big mistake, looking back if the scout is in a similar market.I know what you mean. But, they do known how to assemble cars together (as mediocre as VWs have been) with better consistency and at much greater volume better than Rivian. If you understand how auto assembly lines work, that's no small feat. They also know to engineer with better repairability baked in—the one thing not evident in the R1s, even after refresh. Plus, this effort would involve many people they have poached from Rivian and Tesla. AND, by the time it delivers to customers, it may even include input from the VW-Rivian joint venture. Far too soon to dismiss and get too comfortable with the blindfolds.
Not necessarily. They have the bones of the stack. They still have to devise & deliver a user experience that works. And I don't see RJ being foolish enough to give away everything, including Rivian's own X-factor. The biggest thing Rivian gained through the JV is ability to negotiate and secure supply of high-end computing chips that are critical to autonomy (which means zilch to us Gen 1 owners, but is important for Rivian's ability to compete in the marketplace).Agree. The joint venture giving VW the Rivian software might be a big mistake, looking back if the scout is in a similar market.
Purchasing power, particularly for the R2/R3 is indeed a thing. Rivian already has commitments for the limited numbers of Nvidia, etc. they need for the R1 2nd gen.Not necessarily. They have the bones of the stack. They still have to devise & deliver a user experience that works. And I don't see RJ being foolish enough to give away everything, including Rivian's own X-factor. The biggest thing Rivian gained through the JV is ability to negotiate and secure supply of high-end computing chips that are critical to autonomy (which means zilch to us Gen 1 owners, but is important for Rivian's ability to compete in the marketplace).
Cars are becoming more and more software defined. This is most evident in EVs. This requires a total integration of UX design. VW failed because they had a disjointed approach—a mishmash of new and legacy hardware systems (and software for each). This is the biggest distinction between the newcomers and legacy auto. A recent discussion on a member's experience with his rented Hummer EV is a great example; interfaces that looked like they belong to different cars.
If it has the quarter window, I'm 100% in.Silhouette is a 2005 Range Rover, but if it has a straight, vertical B pillar, angled up glass at the rear pillar (as appropriated by Lexus GX470) and some bold diagonal graphics (like WV has for their IDBuzz) it'll look "Scout" enough.
![]()
Actually, cars are like forums members, benign but offensive in most ways.Cars are like women. They come in all shapes and sizes and I love them all.
Nah, he only made one truck.I heard Henrik Fisker is available on a consultation basis for design elements![]()
Shoulda sold the Alaska design to someone.Nah, he only made one truck.
For Gumby.
![]()
Agreed, I put a deposit down on one (and got my refund before the Fisker meltdown started).Shoulda sold the Alaska design to someone.