R1Sky Business
Well-Known Member
- Thread starter
- #1
Would anyone consider anything like this soon?
Sponsored
Announcing our new "CLUBS" section where you can join or create a Rivian club or group! You can use this new feature to conveniently plan and discuss local events, gatherings or other club/group related topics.
So we encourage you to join (or start) special-interest and regional-based Rivian clubs at: https://www.rivianforums.com/forum/group-categories/clubs-groups.1/
I can’t. It’s like bad spelling on a drawing or technical document. If that’s wrong then what else was ignored?Please ignore the differentials!!!
Agreed with all of your points besides your statement about no radiator being present behind the bumper. There is an AC condenser, which is essentially a radiator, and an actual radiator for the battery coolant loop in that front stack as well.I can’t. It’s like bad spelling on a drawing or technical document. If that’s wrong then what else was ignored?
What is the brush guard protecting? There Is no radiator in that location to save. The headlights are polycarbonate. Why did it sprout 6 lug hubs?
Why is the bumper shaped like there’s an engine to protect?
that spare wheel sticking through the hood…
The heat exchanger(s?) are angled and pretty far back. Which is what I meant by “there is no radiator in that location“. Potato, potato.Agreed with all of your points besides your statement about no radiator being present behind the bumper. There is an AC condenser, which is essentially a radiator, and an actual radiator for the battery coolant loop in that front stack as well.
Puller fan behind the cooling stack in pic below with frunk liner removed:
Will it require additional protection when off-roading? No. But it's there.
That would be a No. This doesn't even pretend to explain how you are going to lift everything and just throws some regular axles and diffs under the body. It looks ridiculous.Would anyone consider anything like this soon?
There are a thousand bad ideas in this render but I actually don't think fuel tanks are the worst one (even if those are probably intended to be water tanks).Love all the gas tanks on top. I can see bringing extra battery packs to compensate for the range loss due to tires, bumpers and the rack.
Second one maybeWould anyone consider anything like this soon?
If you are bringing an ICE with you, you may as well have it under the hood.There are a thousand bad ideas in this render but I actually don't think fuel tanks are the worst one (even if those are probably intended to be water tanks).
Batteries are awesome but offer extremely poor energy density compared to gas. If you're truly headed off grid and need more than you can reliably get from the drive pack and charging infrastructure, you're better off bringing gasoline or diesel and a generator than batteries. A few gallons of gas and a generator will be lighter, more versatile, provide more energy, and are refillable. It's certainly not ideal but would enable remote boondocking far from chargers as long as you're not in a hurry, and still nets out to comparable efficiency to an ICE truck when charging off the generator.
Why? I can get 70+ MPGe 99% of the time, dramatically lower environmental impact for the class, enjoy a much better vehicle (ride quality, features, storage, performance, technology) than the competition, and have the option of a fossil fuel top-off in the edge case where I need it.If you are bringing an ICE with you, you may as well have it under the hood.
Yes like the sensors and cameras that will be used for Driver+?I can’t. It’s like bad spelling on a drawing or technical document. If that’s wrong then what else was ignored?