iansriv
Well-Known Member
Mark-brilliant note! I'm a few steps behind you. I absolutely agree with you. My solar panels are connected to the grid and I get 1-1 net metering. So, I've been a bit lazy about adding batteries. I also dont fancy using the Rivian as a constant battery for the home. My current inverter is a Growatt. It's "cheap" and does the job well. However, my choices are limited IF I choose to add batteries. At some point, I will probably add batteries even if it means switching to a different inverter. Cheers.A couple of thoughts here. I recently put in an inverter and batteries. After going through this adventure my perspective on V2H has changed.
I didn't go with the SigEnergy solution as their inverter only works with their proprietary batteries, so if they go belly up or they decide to gouge for their batteries you are stuck with them. Other solutions on the market will work with any current 48V battery so you aren't locked into a single vendor for your batteries. I've learned over time that single vendor solutions can be very painful.
I don't currently have V2H bidi charging with the inverter I selected but I'm hopeful that solutions will become available down the road, maybe. I have had a solar array on the roof for over 10 years with micro-inverters so the inverter I went with had to be able to accept the AC from the panels and be able to do the frequency shifting necessary to keep the panels producing in a grid down situation.
I added batteries (32kwh storage at this time) mostly for grid down situations. I had an e-panel installed to automatically reduce my loads if the grid fails, and I do some load shedding through home automation to further reduce loads. I bring this up because the installer of the inverter didn't have a clue about home automation and how to manage loads (if you are looking, consider your installer's technical expertise on controlling the whole house, not just slapping an inverter and some batteries on the wall).
Because I had the foresight to put in solar panels when the power company was offering 1 to 1 net metering I get a KWh back for each KWh I send to them, which reduces my incentives to use the batteries for Time of Use (TOU) to reduce my power bills. I have however learned a lot about the flexibility of modern inverters and how to configure them.
My inverter is fully capable of setting all sorts of parameters for how TOU would work if I were to go that direction, whether I were able to use V2H or not. One mention, you'd never run your batteries to 0% and through the Battery Management System (BMS) you can adjust things like the charge curve so once you get to a certain level the BMS will slow the charge so as you approach 100% you aren't cooking the batteries being charged. Another thing to keep in mind is your loads in your house rarely run at peak demand all day long, so even if you can put say, 200 amps through your electrical panel most of the day your load is much less.
Even if I had a financial incentive to use TOU and I had V2H bidi abilities, I'm not sure I'd use my batteries and drain them to the max to help the power company handle peak loads. Because the grid can fail, my primary goal is to keep the house running without the maintenance costs and headaches of a generator, so there is some incentive to not sell all my stored power to the power company, whether that power comes from my on-site batteries or from my vehicle. Additionally, if the TOU incentives were lucrative enough, I'd probably just go with more batteries and a bigger solar array rather than using my EV as the batteries are less costly to replace if one goes bad, they are warranted for over 8000 charge discharge cycles which is about 21 years of charge/discharge cycles if you were to have one cycle every day, and I can more closely monitor their parameters through the BMS software on the inverter and the battery packs. The batteries are always at the house whereas I drive my Rivian, so the vehicle wouldn't always be available to cover my house loads or fill in when TOU rates are the highest.
It would be nice to have the Rivian able to send juice back to my house in grid down situations when my fixed batteries are discharged and the sky is cloudy but I'm not about to drain the Rivian's battery to the point where I have to seek out a DCFC before I can drive anywhere as there is a chance the DCFC would be down as well, just to make some bucks on sellig power back to the power company. Stand alone batteries continue to get less expensive and more durable. A couple of years ago I would have told you the solution is V2H, now with some experience with a stand alone solution I'm less concerned with V2H solutions.
Sponsored