George Kaplan
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- George
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2024
- Threads
- 1
- Messages
- 132
- Reaction score
- 168
- Location
- California
- Vehicles
- R1T
Came here to say same—I didn’t see in the story that Rivian was charging a monthly “membership Fee” as Tesla does to tap into the cheaper rates. If one needs to hit the SC network frequently during the month, then the $13/mo may make sense. Otherwise, it needs to be factored into the otherwise lowered price/kWhr.This is like comparing a Granny Smith to a Gala.
The Pismo beach fascist electricity dispenser is $.60 for non members and $.46+ $12.00 a month for members. So as long as you are getting over 300 kWh a month its cheaper.
As to the hand-wringing over the price at DCFC—welcome to 2025. Tesla and Rivian are both seeing their networks as revenue generators, given the decision by both companies to open their networks to other brands. OF COURSE they’re raising the $/kWhr price.
Elon wasn’t making a move to defend the planet when he wrote his agreements with Ford, Rivian, GM, et al. He was setting up Tesla to build a revenue stream which was not cyclical as hardware sales are. RJ is doing the same, albeit on a MUCH smaller scale. These are important moves to help stream cash into their respective companies on a monthly basis, irrespective of how car sales are trending at that moment.
Sponsored