Kelvn
Well-Known Member
1/2 second faster by itself is not the reason it feels so much faster. it's 1/2 second in context. 1/2 second faster if your 0-60 was 10 seconds is not a big deal, but 1/2 second faster at 3 vs 3.5 seconds is % delta much larger.I've owned both. The Quad was faster - it amazes me that 1/2 a second is clearly noticeable.
1. 10s -> 9.5s ~ 5% reduction in time
2. 3.5s -> 3s ~ 14% reduction in time
It's similar to Miles per gallon vs Gallons per mile. MPG is not linear so the improvements aren't as intuitive as Gallons per 100 mile. 1 MPG increase is nothing for a car that gets 35-45mpg, but for a car that gets 10-15 (like a truck) thats a big deal.MPG
1. +1mpg @ 35-45mpg ~ 2.2-2.8% increase
2. +1mpg @ 10-15mpg ~6.6-10% increase
So 1 MPG increase converted to Gal/100Mile shows a more obvious improvement.1. 35mpg = 2.85 Gal/100Mile with a change to 2.77 Gal/100Mile; - 0.08gal/100Miles
2. 10mpg = 10 Gal/100Mile with a change to 9.09 Gal/100Mile; - 0.91gal/100Miles
And that ends my digression.Actually, before I end. I guess kWh/mi vs mi/kWh would have been a more relevant topic to Rivian owners. Same things though kWh/mi is more linear/easier to understand efficiency differences than mi/kWh.
Sponsored