AJacobs
Member
- First Name
- Alex
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2023
- Threads
- 3
- Messages
- 13
- Reaction score
- 14
- Location
- Washington State
- Vehicles
- R1T
- Occupation
- Pilot
- Thread starter
- #1
Am I crazy or do these numbers seem pretty off for what I should be getting? I know driving mode, driving style, cabin heat and ambient temp are all huge variables, but getting less than 1.5 mi/kwh tells me something isn't right. Sure the first 100 mi I had some fun driving in sport and did a few launches, but for the last 500mi I've been paranoid about getting the efficiency closer to 2mi/kwh where it should be, even with 20" AT. Those 500mi have been mostly 50/50 in conserve and all purpose, ambient temps have been 35-40 lows and 50-55 highs, hardly using any cabin heating/cooling, and I've been trying to drive as eco-friendly as possible. After around 300mi it reached 1.45-1.5mi/kwh and has stagnated since then. The range estimate on my dash ticks down about 1/3 faster than the actual miles I've driven. Yesterday I took a trip in conserve mode and after 100mi of range used, I only drove 69 miles and it was easy driving.
Also the total energy of 222.4 kwh seems so completely off. I think the truck has taken double that. 607/222 = 2.7mi/kwh (which would be phenomenal) but the truck has taken probably double that. I think the calculation of energy used is off by a factor of two. 697/444 = 1.36mi/kwh which makes more sense with the 1.48 I'm getting when you factor in phantom drain, gear guard, environmental, and all the other miscellaneous energy draws.
Even though I have less than 1000mi and have only had it 2 weeks, I think something is definitely wrong so I submitted a service request, they quoted me a few hundred bucks in diagnostics (and like 5 months away for the Bellevue center.... not happy about that wait), but this should be under warranty right?
Also the total energy of 222.4 kwh seems so completely off. I think the truck has taken double that. 607/222 = 2.7mi/kwh (which would be phenomenal) but the truck has taken probably double that. I think the calculation of energy used is off by a factor of two. 697/444 = 1.36mi/kwh which makes more sense with the 1.48 I'm getting when you factor in phantom drain, gear guard, environmental, and all the other miscellaneous energy draws.
Even though I have less than 1000mi and have only had it 2 weeks, I think something is definitely wrong so I submitted a service request, they quoted me a few hundred bucks in diagnostics (and like 5 months away for the Bellevue center.... not happy about that wait), but this should be under warranty right?
Sponsored