But unless the Rivian API has changed recently you can’t pull any actual energy data, just the SoC to the nearest tenth. I have an app much like EletrriFI and I have seen swings in the SoC after sitting overnight in both directions likely due to some BMS operations.It reports data on the vehicle's state even when not driving, every sleep period, every time it wakes, beginning and end SOCs, etc etc. If it's never sleeping it will show that clearly.
As a fellow Sense owner … I trust that as far as I can throw my Rivian.FWIW The energy measurement is coming from the Sense monitor in our electric panel.
Are you really getting 3 miles per kWh? I can get that in my Model S but my R1S is closer to 2.2 miles or 33 miles for 15kWh.15kwh is 45 miles of range and an insane amount of drain. It would have to be running the AC or heat for that 24 hours.
It’s unlikely you are getting 45 miles on 15kwh. I haven’t seen anyone post efficiency if15kwh is 45 miles of range and an insane amount of drain. It would have to be running the AC or heat for that 24 hours.
No it’s not. It’s a lot of “phantom drain”….but it’s not 45 miles….more like 30-3515kwh is 45 miles of range and an insane amount of drain. It would have to be running the AC or heat for that 24 hours.
I think the Rivian unit is hardwired as well... I could be wrong, I'm using a JuiceBox on an outlet. I like having the outlet due to the flexibility it provides. I don't do it often, but it's nice to be able to unplug the charger and plug in a welder.Oh good point… I never thought about it potentially being the charger itself. It’s an older, preexisting 16amp Bosch hardwired EVSE. We have been putting off upgrading until our remodel later this year. I guess I could pretty easily swap the hardwire to a plug and use the Rivian charger.
9 miles of range would roughly equal 3.6kWh, assuming around 2.5mi/kWh efficiency. That's around 20min of charging at 15kW each day to overcome.Seems to be about 8-9 miles of range. Will look at percentages moving forward.
*taps sign showing the difference between kW and kWh once again*15KW is more than sleeping in the car with the ac on for 24 hours would pull.
I assume he meant kWh, but just a note must of us are getting around 2.5mi/kWh not kWh/mi.9 miles of range would roughly equal 23kWh assuming around 2.5kWh/mi efficiency. That's only an hour and a half of 15kW charging to overcome each day.
You said your charger hits 15kW when the vehicle is parked long term. That's a momentary power figure. That's normal, assuming your charger isn't drawing that amount of power constantly. How many kWh does the charger use each day when you leave the vehicle parked?
Good catch! Did all my math backwards and 9mi of range is even less of a concern when doing it correctly....must of us are getting around 2.5mi/kWh not kWh/mi.
Thanks for sharing Cliff.*taps sign showing the difference between kW and kWh once again*
I'm still unclear on the original issue. Did the vehicle draw a peak of 15kW from the charger as you originally stated (and if so, for how long), or did it replenish 15kWh from the charger? We have no indication of a problem here if your charger peaked at 15kW to overcome phantom loss because we have no way of knowing how much loss it was overcoming.Used the ElectriFi site. Actual phantom was 0.43 kWh yesterday (left unplugged). Has to be something else - the charger, what Sense is stating, or it is preconditioning or battery cycling for some reason starting when the truck is programmed to allow charging to start. Thanks for the recommendations everyone.
I've not seen reports showing 24 usage from the charger viewpoint, measuring kwhr used by a charger plugged into the truck that didn't need a charge. Would be interesting to see other data points. I will try it this week. It would not surprise me if R1 does some extra things that require more power to maintain a charge state 24/hr/day, but 15kwhr/day seems really high.FWIW The energy measurement is coming from the Sense monitor in our electric panel.