I can see them wanting to maximize services like tire rotation, but since they do not fit new tires they know third party sites will be lifting these vehicles. They need to make things easier to be fully accepted into the mainstream and not have things like this (and 12V battery placement) being awkward and alienating the mainstream.Disappointing. While I've been a big fan of Rivian overall, it's little details like this lift point that drives me nuts. This is a company that tries to distinguish itself to be sustainable, focused on customer experiences, and seamlessly orchestrating "millions of decisions" for a single product.
This unusual lift point makes it feel like someone in the Rivian financial department snuck their way into product design to drive up service numbers. R2 customers probably might now need to go out of their way to a service center or risk damage to their vehicle because tire shops have to keep adapting.
Maybe someone can help educate me on vehicle engineering, but I feel like vehicle lifting (even heavy battery EVs) should have been a problem already solved by now that didn't need another unusual spin.
On the other hand, hopefully this means good business for @Mark_AZR1T to make more accessories that fills the missing gap Rivian overlooked. I have a set of 4 Jack Pucks myself!
I wonder if instead of "optimized for service center" they meant "optimized for manufacturing".I get the idea, but the R2 jack point simply isn’t machined for positive engagement. There’s no defined locating feature, and the center cavity isn’t a keyed geometry (look at rounding of edges). Unlike the R1, a puck can’t lock in, everything depends on friction and precise placement.
Yes, but I bet they will stick with same jack points and crossbars for R3/X and any other additional models that stem from this platform so there will be some continuity.Guess the crossbars aren't the only thing not compatible between the R1 and R2. Looks like were going to need jack pucks unique to this design. Strange choice.
Not clear in the picture but it appears that you could lift it with a standard floor jack without the use of pucks. The required use of pucks for R!’s is always a LIMFAC on who can service these, both in training and equipment.Probably very wishful thinking but by any chance is the polymer pad raised a bit and the surrounding recessed area is 5"x5" allowing for some shop two post lifts to fit in the cavity but only pressure lift on the 2"x4" pad?
One would sure hope so!I guess the $799 spare tire kit from the accessory store will have one puck or maybe a proprietary bottle jack with a special interface.
Maybe the hired the team from Apple responsible for power and accessory connector choice.Why do they keep doing this?